Anaplastic extramedullary plasmacytoma resistant to novel therapies: A case report

The treatment of choice for extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is radiotherapy (RT). It is under discussion whether the management of an anaplastic form of EMP requires the addition of systemic therapy. We present a case of a 66-year-old male who was diagnosed with anaplastic plasmacytoma of the maxillary sinus. After the exclusion of multiple myeloma, Dara-VMP (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone) regimen was initiated. During the third cycle of Dara-VMP, a progression of the tumor was observed. RT and BRd (bendamustine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide) regimen were initiated. After 4 cycles of BRd, disease progression was established. KRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. The first cycle of KRd was not completed, as the patient was diagnosed with COVID-19. After the infection, the progression of EMP was observed. In this case, the anaplastic EMP was resistant to RT and chemotherapy regimens with novel agents, including a monoclonal antibody, an immunomodulatory drug, and proteasome inhibitors. Copyright © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Drug-induced pericarditis

Though not common, drug-induced pericarditis is a serious condition, since pericardial tamponade, should it develop, may be life-threatening. As the number of drugs is constantly expanding, so does the proportion of those capable of causing pericarditis. The authors reviewed the relevant literature in the PubMed database and complemented it with information from the VigiBase database. In their article, the authors present current knowledge about the mechanisms of origin and level of risk of drug-induced pericarditis and discuss relevant information on individual drugs divided into 7 classes. Some medicines are associated with a high risk of developing pericarditis, a fact to be taken into account when treating patients with these agents. © 2022 Czech Society of Cardiology Z.S. All rights reserved.

Impact of Covid-19 in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction: Recent studies have shown an increased risk of covid infections in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to patients withoutMM, a reduction in the number of new diagnoses ofMMin 2020 compared to 2019 as well as a decrease in the survival of newly diagnoses patients. The general objective of this study was to analyze the possible impact of covid-19 pandemic in the treatment plan for patients withMM who are candidates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Material(s) and Method(s): All patients with MM who received autologous HSCT in our hospital between March 2020 and October 2021 has been included in the study. This period coincides with the beginning of the confinement for covid-19 in our country and the date of which 88,4% of the population over 12 years of age had received the complete vaccination schedule at that time according to official data. Patient demographics, disease-related variables were obtained from the patient's medical record. On the other hand, treatment-related variables were collected from the eprescription program. Results and discussion: A total of 13 patients were undergoing induction treatment or underwent autologous HSCT during the study period, 62% were men. The median age of the patients was 55 years (30-69). Almost all patients (92,3%) were affected in some way the planned treatment. The reasons were the following: the induction treatment had to be prolonged in 5 patients (increase in the number of cycles due to the impossibility of performing the HSCT), in 4 patients the induction treatment had to be changed (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for bortezomib/ thalidomide/dexamethasone) due to the impossibility of performing apheresis as planned after the third cycle, 2 patients had delay in starting second-line treatment after disease relapse or in starting consolidation treatment and 1 patient suffered a delay in the diagnosis of relapse (delay in the planned CT scan confirming progression). Conclusion(s): Although we cannot yet know the impact on survival, the covid-19 pandemic has meant an alteration in the treatment plan of practically all myeloma patients who are candidates for HSCT and who were receiving anti-myeloma therapy in our hospital in the first 18 months after the declaration of the pandemic in our country.

Isolated Colonic Histoplasmosis in Renal Transplant Recipient Post Covid-19 Infection

Introduction: Histoplasmosis is caused by the dimorphic fungus - Histoplasma capsulatum. The presentation of histoplasmosis is often disseminated, though primary intestinal involvement can rarely be seen in patients with cell mediated immune dysfunction like in patients with AIDS. We report a case of renal allograft recipient, who had history of COVID 19 infection and also underwent anti-rejection treatment for renal graft dysfunction, presented with chronic diarrhea and was diagnosed as a case of colonic histoplasmosis. Method(s): We report a case of 45 years old male who underwent renal transplant surgery one and a half year prior (February 2021) and was having stable graft function on tacrolimus, mycophenolate and steroid. He had history of fever and diarrhea in February 2022 and was diagnosed COVID-19 positive with RT-PCR, and was treated conservatively with intravenous dexamethasone and lowering of immunosuppressants. He had mild graft dysfunction in April 2022;renal graft biopsy had acute T-Cell mediated rejection (Banff Grade 1 B) and was treated with pulse steroids for 3 days. He had complaint of intermittent diarrhea, weight loss and intermittent fever since May 2022. He was evaluated and treated on outpatient basis with empirical oral antibiotics. He was admitted in June 2022 with complaint of high grade fever, loose stools leading to hypovolemic shock and renal dysfunction. He had marked thrombocytopenia and neutrophilic leukocytosis. He showed initial response to intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics and crystalloids, but intermittently symptoms of increased stool frequency and altered consistency were still persisting. Stool studies for ova, cyst, parasites and clostridium difficile were negative. Indian ink staining of stool sample had no evidence of Cryptococcosis. Serum PCR for cytomegalovirus was also negative. CT abdomen showed normal visualized bowel and other viscera. Upper GI endoscopy was unremarkable. Colonoscopy revealed multiple small ulcers with erythematous hue and clean base particularly in ceacum and along ascending colon. Multiple colonic biopsies were taken. Histopathology showed lymphoplasmacytic infilterate in the lamina propria. It also showed increased presence of foamy histiocytes, several of which also showed interacellular organism bearing a pseudocapsule. PAS stain also confirmed budding of these interacellular organisms which is consistent with Histoplasmosis. His HRCT chest revealed hyperinflated lungs, cylindrical bronchiectasis in left upper lobe. Urine for histoplasma antigenuria was negative. Result(s): He was treated with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B for initial two weeks followed by oral itraconazole. His symptoms responded remarkably to the treatment. In view of persisting thrombocytopenia and histoplasmosis his mycophenolate was stopped and tacrolimus was titrated as per trough levels Conclusion(s): Colonic histoplasmosis is associated with significant mortatlity and morbidity. Prolonged use of immunosuprresants, use of antirejection therapies (like high dose pulse methyl prednisolone and bortezomib) and even in some case reports COVID 19 infection have shown to increase the risk of histoplasmosis. Primary and isolated colonic histoplasmosis like in this case can be the atypical presentation which emphasizes the importance of maintaining a low threshold for consideration of histoplasmosis in renal allograft recipients. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

Herpesviral encephalitis associated with bortezomib use in a patient with multiple myeloma and associated light-chain amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Bortezomib is proteasome inhibitor used in multiple myeloma treatment. The reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) during bortezomib-based therapy is a well-known adverse event. Antiviral prophylaxis is mandatory. Nevertheless, reports of herpesviral encephalitis are scarce. CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old multiple myeloma patient who during CyBorD protocol (Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone), after a transient suspension of antiviral prophylaxis presented progressive headaches unresponsive to conventional analgesics, asthenia, fever, episodic visual hallucinations, and vesicular lesions in the right supraorbital and frontal region. Herpetic encephalitis was diagnosed after detecting herpes zoster in cerebrospinal fluid. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: The patient was treated with acyclovir 500mg every 6 hours for 21 days, and subsequent valacyclovir prophylaxis achieving an excellent clinical evolution. Anti-myeloma treatment was changed to lenalidomide and dexamethasone achieving a durable complete response. Herpesviral encephalitis is a rare but severe complication associated with the use of Bortezomib, especially when patients did not receive acyclovir prophylaxis. However, a rapid detection based on the clinical suspicion, and the prompt start of treatment, may lead to overcome this adverse event.

ADDITION OF IXAZOMIB TO POMALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE IMPROVES PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS PROGRESSING ON LENALIDOMIDE AS PART OF 1ST LINE THERAPY: ALLIANCE A061202

Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance and continuous LEN-based induction therapy until disease progression have become standard of care for frontline therapy of multiple myeloma (MM). As such, an increasing number of patients (pts) in need of 2nd line therapy have LEN-refractory disease. Optimal treatment in this setting has not been rigorously assessed in randomized studies. The phase I portion of Alliance A061202 demonstrated the safety of the ixazomib-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (IXA-POM-DEX) combination for the treatment of pts with LEN and proteasome inhibitor (PI)-refractory MM. Aims: In the randomized phase II portion, we evaluated the addition of IXA to POM-DEX for PI naïve / sensitive pts progressing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), depth of response, survival and safety. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to IXA-POM-DEX or POM-DEX and stratified by prior bortezomib exposure, International Staging System stage (1 and 2 vs 3) and the presence of high-risk cytogenetics. POM was administered at 4 mg on days 1-21;IXA 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15;and DEX 20 mg (>75 years (yrs)) or 40 mg (≤75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression, the emergence of unacceptable side effects or withdrawal of treatment consent. Results: 38 and 39 eligible pts were assigned to IXA-POM-DEX and POM-DEX, respectively. The median age was 66 yrs (range 41-83) and 64 yrs (range 52-85). A planned first interim analysis was conducted after 43 out of 57 required events had occurred. PFS favored the IXA-POM-DEX arm (one-sided log rank test value = 4.6345, p=0.03134 [< p-value boundary of 0.058]), yielding a hazard ratio of 0.528 (upper 90% bound = 0.777). A stratified log-rank test found that PFS was superior for the triplet after adjusting for stratification factors (one-sided stratified log rank test value = 5.8371;p=0.0157), adjusted hazard ratio 0.451 (upper 90% bound = 0.694). The ORR favored IXA-POM-DEX (63.2% vs 43.6%, p=0.0853), and the ≥very good partial response was 26.3% vs 5.1%, respectively (p=0.01). The clinical benefit rate (ORR + minimal response rate) was 73.7% and 56.4%. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue in 40%, 37%, 16% and 16% of IXAPOM-DEX-treated pts and 26%, 21%, 13%, and 15% of POM-DEX-treated pts. Therapy was discontinued for disease progression in 47.4% of pts on IXA-POM-DEX and 76.9% of pts on POM-DEX and for adverse events in 7.9% and 7.7% of pts, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: The addition of IXA to the POM-DEX backbone improved the depth of response and PFS for pts relapsing on LEN as part of 1st line therapy. Hematologic toxicity was increased with the addition of IXA, but side effects were manageable. The ease of administration of this all-oral combination allowed for safer, uninterrupted treatment during the COVID pandemic. Our results should be confirmed in phase III trials but lend support for this regimen as part of 2nd line therapy for this patient population.

DREAMM-9: PHASE I STUDY OF BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN PLUS STANDARD OF CARE IN PATIENTS WITH TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Background: The bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen is a standard of care for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate that eliminates myeloma cells by a multimodal mechanism: direct cell kill and anti-myeloma tumor immune response. Belamaf has demonstrated deep and durable responses as a monotherapy in the DREAMM-2 study of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Preclinical evidence of belamaf in combination with bortezomib or lenalidomide suggests enhanced anti-myeloma activity, providing rationale for this treatment combination. Aims: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination in adult pts with transplant-ineligible (TI) NDMM and establish the recommended Phase III dose. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is an ongoing Phase I, open-label, randomized study of belamaf + VRd. The belamaf dose cohorts currently being evaluated are Cohort 1 (1.9 mg/kg Q3/4W), Cohort 2 (1.4 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 3 (1.9 mg/kg Q6/8W), Cohort 4 (1.0 mg/kg Q3/4W), and Cohort 5 (1.4 mg/kg Q3/4W). Belamaf is given with VRd Q3W until Cycle 8, and with Rd Q4W thereafter. After evaluation of safety data for Cohort 1, Cohorts 2-5 were opened in parallel and enrolled pts were randomized 1:1:1:1. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: As of data cutoff (07 Dec 2021), 64 pts were analyzed across all cohorts. Median age (range) was 73.0 (51- 88) years, 55% were male, 80% were white, 8% had extramedullary disease, 59% were International Staging System stage II or III, 20% had amp1q, and 17% had high-risk cytogenetics (≥1 of: t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p). The median duration of follow-up varied: Cohort 1 (17.4 months [mo]), Cohort 2 (5.9 mo), Cohort 3 (6.1 mo), Cohort 4 (4.7 mo), Cohort 5 (5.8 mo). Median number of belamaf cycles were: Cohort 1 (6), Cohort 2 (3), Cohort 3 (3.5), Cohort 4 (4.5), and Cohort 5 (5). Most common adverse events (AEs) across cohorts included thrombocytopenia (49%), constipation (43%), diarrhea (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (30%). AEs related to study treatment were experienced by 61 (97%) pts. Belamaf-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 24 (38%) pts. Belamaf dose reductions occurred in 11 (18%) pts, with dose delays in 10 (16%) pts. Three pts experienced a fatal severe AE (unrelated to study treatment);2 due to COVID-19 infection, 1 due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early deep responses were observed;67-92% pts achieved ≥very good partial response (VGPR) (Table), with median time to VGPR of 2.1-2.9 months across cohorts. Of pts with ≥VGPR, 17 were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative, 10 in Cohort 1. As of data cutoff, 8-75% of pts achieved best response of complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR). Grade 3 corneal exam findings were reported in 25-58% of pts;grade 3 visual acuity changes were reported in 21-75% of pts. No grade 4 corneal exam findings or visual acuity changes were reported in pts receiving belamaf Q6/8W, compared with 0-17% and 0-8%, respectively, in the Q3/4W cohorts. Belamaf PK profile was similar to that in pts with RRMM, accounting for baseline characteristics. Image: Summary/Conclusion: Belamaf + VRd demonstrated high response rates in pts with TI NDMM, with a high rate of MRD negativity indicating deep responses. No new safety signals were observed relative to DREAMM-2. Study is ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of variable dose intensities of belamaf in combination with VRd.

REAL WORLD DATA ON BORTEZOMIB-BASED THERAPY IN WALDENSTRÖM'S MACROGLOBULINAEMIA: EFFECTIVE EVEN IN MULTIPLY TREATED PATIENTS INCLUDING PRIOR BTKINHIBITORS

Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent lymphoma with a prolonged disease course which typically follows a remitting and relapsing trajectory, eventually leading to treatment resistance. Several treatment options exist including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), rituximab-containing regimens, and bortezomibcontaining regimens. Treatment selection is based on patient performance status, disease characteristics, drug tolerability and availability. Aims: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of bortezomib-based regimens in WM. Methods: Data for patients who had Bortezomib-containing regimens between 2010 and 2021 from 6 centres in the United Kingdom were retrospectively reviewed. Data was acquired from the WMUK Rory Morrison Registry. Research ethics approval was obtained. Results: Thirty-four patients were identified: 32/34 had Bortezomib-containing regimens once and 2/34 had >1 Bortezomib-containing regimens on separate occasions, giving a total of 38 subcutaneous Bortezomib-containing regimens administered at bi-weekly and weekly schedules. Median age was 62 years (37-87), with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (0-7), at a median duration of 49.6 months from date of WM diagnosis (0.7-422). 5 patients received a prior BTKi, with the Bortezomib regimen prescribed following a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (2-5) in this group. Patients who were treated at first line had elected for non-chemotherapy regimens. Median performance status was 1 (0-2) in 23 evaluable patients. The median M-protein at initiation was 34.5g/l (8-60) with bone marrow infiltration 70%, and haemoglobin 94g/l (88-107). A median of 5 cycles (1-8) were delivered and 65% (13/20) received a dose of 1.6mg/m2 and 35% (7/20) received 1.3mg/m2. Grade (G) 1 to 2 neuropathy occurred in 19% (5/26) of evaluable patients but did not result in treatment cessation in any case. Six of 25 (24%) needed a dose reduction, the majority due to G1-2 neuropathy (67%;4/6). Gastrointestinal disturbance occurred in 12% (3/26) patients, 1 required admission with G4 diarrhoea and remaining cases were G1. Of 34 evaluable cases, major response rate (≥ PR) was 74% (5 CR, 6 VGPR, 14 PR). 62% (8/13) of patients receiving 1.6mg/m2 achieved a major response and 86% (6/7) of those who received 1.3mg/m2. Three of 5 patients who had prior BTKi achieved PR, 1 MR, 1 SD. Two patients had treatment discontinued due refractory disease. The overall median time to best response was 81 days from end of treatment. Six of 19 (26%) evaluable patients achieved best response during therapy. Two patients died during treatment due to infection (COVID;respiratory sepsis), not attributable to disease relapse. Eighteen patients (60%;18/30) had treatment after bortezomib regimens at a median of 5.3 months (0-75) and are alive. Median follow up was 30 months (1-111). Twenty-one evaluable patients (72%;21/29) were alive at the end of follow up. Image: Summary/Conclusion: This retrospective real-world analysis shows that bortezomib-containing regimens have utility in WM with effective major response rates even in those with multiple prior lines of therapy and heavy marrow infiltration including BTKi failures. Lower bortezomib doses are effective, and GI and neurotoxicity are manageable with dose reductions but no treatment discontinuations in this real-world cohort indicating an acceptable safety profile.

CLINICAL, LABORATORY PROFILE, TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF PRIMARY AMYLOIDOSIS IN THE ERA OF NOVEL AGENTS: AN EXPERIENCE FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN INDIA

Background: Diagnosis of AL amyloidosis requires demonstration of amyloid in affected tissues along with clonal plasma cells in bone marrow or presence of monoclonal light chains in blood. With increasing awareness among physicians and availability of proper diagnostics, more cases of AL amyloidosis are being diagnosed. Here we present our experience of AL amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment in the era of modern diagnostics and therapy with novel agents. Aims: We aimed to describe the clinical presentations, laboratory features and outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis in a single center using standard diagnostic tests and treatment with novel agents. Methods: A retrospective analysis of AL amyloidosis patients, diagnosed in our hospital, a tertiary care center in India from January 2016 to December 2021. The data was collected from departmental database. All statistical analyses were done by SPSS version 17. Results: Diagnosis of AL amyloidosis was done in 27 patients. Median age of presentation was 59 years. 22 (81.5%) were males. Major symptoms were pedal edema (37%), shortness of breath (22.2%), frothy urine (11.1%) and fatigue (11.1%). Twenty two (81.5%) presented with ECOG PS ≥ 2. Most common system involved was renal in 16 (59.2%), followed by cardiac in 13 (48.1%) and gastro-intestinal in 9 (33.3%). Fifteen (55.6%) had two or more system involvement while 12 (44.4%) had single system involvement. Lambda monoclonal light chain was present in 22/27 (81.5%) and kappa monoclonal light chain was present in 5/27 (18.5%). Median Hb was 11.6 g/dl (range 6.7- 14.8 g/dl), median M-protein was 0.69 g/dL (range 0-2 g/dL) and median bone marrow plasma cells were 7% (range- 1-18%). Fourteen patients were treated;cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBORD) in 10/14 (71.4%) and bortezomib + dexamethasone in 4/14 (28.6%). Among 14 patients followed up with median follow up of 13 months (range 6-60 months), 5 expired;3 due to COVID, one due to cardiac arrhythmia (during first cycle) and one due to relapse and rest 9 were alive. Among the 9 patients who were alive 6 were in complete hematological response and 3 were in partial response after 6 cycles of therapy. Summary/Conclusion: Our study presents the spectrum of clinical manifestations, management and outcomes of primary amyloidosis in Indian context. There is a need to increase the awareness among the physicians about amyloidosis so that early diagnosis can be made and timely treatment can be done with novel agents to improve the dismal historical results.

UPDATE AND FOLLOW-UP OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA (NDMM) WITH HIGH-RISK CYTOGENETIC (HRC)

Background: Despite therapeutic strategies improvement, there is still a subgroup of NDMM patients (pts) that pose a clinical challenge, whose represents a <20%, we refer to HRC. HRC Pts are associated with a poor prognosis and aggressive course, although, recent studies propose different clinical evolution according to the cytogenetic alteration (CA). IMWG identified a 4-year progression free survival (PFS) of 12% and OS of 35%. Aims: Describe our clinical experience and therapeutic management, also the clinical-biochemical alterations at diagnosis in a heterogeneous NDMM HRC's cohort. Evaluate survival curves according to HRC. Methods: Descriptive and retrospective analysis, using clinical and analytical NDMM HRC patient's data from 2009 to 2022 at Guadalajara University Hospital. 61/201 pts were selected in the MM treatment (tto) protocols. FISH results were not found in <30% NDMM, due to lack of metaphases or no request. Pts with t(4;14), t(14;16), gain 1q, t(14;20), plasmablastic leukemia and/or del(17p13) were classified as HRC. Survival data and Pearson (P) correlation were used. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Total HRC NDMM 61 pts were analyzed. 21 of 61 pts (35%) were diagnosed with stage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) prior to HRC NDMM, with a mean 4 years (y) (IR 2-10 y), greater % representation of MGUS were del17p (38), gain 1q (48), t (14;16) (4,5) and del17p + gain1q (9,5). Clinical characteristics data at diagnosis according to HRC are shown in Table 1. Pts receiving 1st line were 100% (61), 90,2% of the pts received bortezomib (V) - based induction, of them 29% (n=16) were treated with alkylating agents, 49,1% (n=27) received IMIDs and 18,2% (n=10) V with dexamethasone (d), plus two of these pts received regimens composed of 3xVCd + 3xVPd and the other dara-VRd. 25 pts (40,98%) were transplant eligible (TPH). 2nd line, 32 pts (52,5%), (n=3) VTD-PACE, (n=6) daratumumab (n=1 alone, 3 R, 1 V, 1 K), (n=1) Kdexa, (n=1) Pocydex and (n=9) V plus 3 IMIDs, 2 alkylating, 2 P or 2 alone and (n=12) IMIDs and alkylatings in combination. 5 pts (8,2) were TPH (1 alogenic). 3rd line, 16 pts (26,2), just 3 pts were TPH. 4th line, 7 pts (11,4), 1 pts were TPH. 5th line, 4 pts (6,5). 6th line, 2pts (3,3). In the last lines, the use of triplets with pomalidomide, karfilzomib or intensive chemotherapy prevail. After a median follow-up of 3 y (IR 1,6-6,2) from diagnosis, pts had relapsed at least one time (60,6%) and more than 3 times (11,5%), and 25 had died (40,9%), 16 of them due to infections (14 bacteremia, 2 COVID), 5 cardiorespiratory arrest and 3 due to progression. (Image 1) represents PFS y OS for only 5 CA, as data were no representative in other CA. Correlation between ISS and ISS-R data were only able to execute in HRC gain1q, due to lack of sample in other CA. We found a P coefficient of 0.568399 or 56.83% (p- <0.00578, CI 95%). Summary/Conclusion: Our case series continues with a longer survival curve compared to those commented in other studies. As cytogenetic abnormalities (t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) and gain1q), similar % of representation are described as Kumar. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018, except for del(17p), 23% vs 10%. From the second line, the probability of receiving a new line, the duration of tto and the interval without tto decreased with each line of tto. As treatment lines progress, therapeutic combinations are more heterogeneous and less concordant. A further longer follow-up and higher HRC NDMM pts's recruitment will be necessary to clarify the response to tto regimens based on individual cytogenetic groups.

Bortezomib- and carfilzomib-resistant myeloma cells show increased activity of all three arms of the unfolded protein response

Proteasome inhibitors are among the most potent classes of drugs in multiple myeloma treatment. One of the main challenges in myeloma therapy is acquired resistance to drugs. Several theories have been proposed to describe the mechanisms responsible for resistance to the most commonly used proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib. This study aimed to describe functional differences between sensitive myeloma cells (MM1S WT) and their daughter cell lines resistant to either bortezomib (MM1S/R BTZ) or carfilzomib (MM1S/R CFZ), as well as between both resistant cell lines. Bortezomib- and carfilzomib-resistant cell lines were successfully generated by continuous exposure to the drugs. When exposed to different drugs than during the resistance generation period, MM1S/R BTZ cells showed cross-resistance to carfilzomib, whereas MM1S/R CFZ cells were similarly sensitive to bortezomib as MM1S WT cells. Following proteomic profiling, unsupervised principal component analysis revealed that the MM1S/R BTZ and MM1S/R CFZ cell lines differed significantly from the MM1S WT cell line and from each other. Canonical pathway analysis showed similar pathways enriched in both comparisons - MM1S WT vs. MM1S/R CFZ and MM1S WT vs. MM1S/R BTZ. However, important differences were present in the statistical significance of particular pathways. Key alterations included the ubiquitin-proteasome system, metabolic pathways responsible for redox homeostasis and the unfolded protein response. In functional studies, both drugs continued to reduce chymotrypsin-like proteasome activity in resistant cells. However, the baseline activity of all three catalytic domains of the proteasome was higher in the resistant cells. Differences in generation of reactive oxygen species were identified in MM1S/R BTZ (decreased) and MM1S/CFZ cells (increased) in comparison to MM1S WT cells. Both baseline and drug-induced activity of the unfolded protein response were higher in resistant cells than in MM1S WT cells and included all three arms of this pathway: IRE1α/XBP1s, ATF6 and EIF2α/ATF4 (downstream effectors of PERK). In conclusion, contrary to some previous reports, resistant MM1S cells show upregulation of unfolded protein response activity, reflecting the heterogeneity of multiple myeloma and prompting further studies on the role of this pathway in resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia - A Challenging Case with Multiple Triggers

Introduction Eosinophilic pneumonia is a class of lung diseases characterized by accumulation of eosinophils in the lung. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) is diagnosed through radiographic imaging and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) with elevated eosinophil count (>25%) in the setting of pulmonary symptoms for more than 2 weeks. While CEP is often an idiopathic disease, it may also be caused by medications, illicit substances, or infections. Identifying the trigger is imperative for successful treatment. A 71-year-old man presented with fever and chronic shortness of breath that started after COVID-19 infection (6 months prior to presentation). Medical history was also significant for multiple myeloma, asthma, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and Alzheimer's dementia. Current medications included bortezomib, pomalidomide, aspirin, clopidogrel , donepezil, tramadol and insulin. Lenalidomide was discontinued 3 months prior due to generalized skin rash and high peripheral eosinophilia (19%). On presentation, physical exam revealed mild respiratory distress, bibasilar crackles, and bilateral pedal edema. Long COVID Syndrome was suspected. He was started on antibiotics and diuretics with no improvement. Labs revealed mild peripheral eosinophilia. Chest X-ray showed diffuse bilateral reticular nodular opacities predominantly on the right. CT chest revealed reticulonodular infiltrates in both lungs predominantly in the right upper lobe with small pleural effusion. Bronchoscopy with BAL was negative for infection but revealed 28% eosinophils. Pomalidomide was discontinued and oral prednisone started. Discussion: CEP is part of a group of eosinophilic lung diseases characterized by abnormal accumulation of eosinophils in the lung tissue. Symptoms include dyspnea and cough in the majority of cases, but may also include fever, sinusitis, rhinitis, fatigue and weight loss. The radiographic hallmarks are bilateral alveolar infiltrates peripherally predominantly in the upper lobes and may be ground glass or consolidation. The presence of an elevated eosinophil count (>25%) in a BAL confirms the diagnosis. Though often idiopathic, identification of possible causes is important for proper management. In our case, the patient has multiple risk factors including possible Long COVID Syndrome and malignancy. Medications such as bortezomib, lenalinomide and pomalidomide have been known to cause diffuse lung injury. To the best of our knowledge there is one case report illustrating Lenalinomide related CEP. History of asthma is present in most cases of idiopathic CEP. Our patient had multiple potential triggers for CEP. We suspect that CEP was medication-related in this case. (Figure Presented).

An interesting case of systemic amyloidosis with lung involvement - A case report

Introduction: Systemic amyloidosis is a rare disease with estimated incidence of 10 cases per million personyears. Amyloidosis is caused by misfolding of autologous protein and its extra- cellular deposition resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Case Report: A 63 year old male presented with complaints of breathlessness for past 3 months, bilateral swelling of legs & scrotum and abdominal distension for past 2weeks. He was diagnosed as a case of Amyloidosis (AL type)/ IgG lambda monoclonal gammapathy 2 months back. Renal biopsy s/o Amyloidosis (AL type) & Immuno-electrophoresis revealed IgG lambda monoclonal gammapathy, started on Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and dexamethasone regimen weekly. CT chest reported as interstitial lung disease. Swab for Covid19 negative. ECHO: mildly dilated right chambers, intact septae, corpulmonale. Urine for albumin: ++. 24 hour total urine volume and protein elevated. Bone marrow biopsy: plasma cells in clusters. IHC: CD138:10 to 15%. Sputum for AFB: negative, Mantoux: 0mm, Sputum for gram stain: gram positive cocci in pairs and short chains. Derm(o)- diffuse altered hyper and hypopigmentation (Macules of varying size) present over b/l upper and lower limb. Poikilodermic changes present. Multidisciplinary discussion done. He was treated with oxygen, albumin infusion, chemotherapy and supportive drugs. Conclusion: Pulmonary amyloidosis can be localized or part of systemic amyloidosis. It can present as diffuse alveolar-septal amyloidosis, nodular amyloidosis, tracheobronchial amyloidosis. Pulmonary interstitial involvement along with cardiac amyloidosis can result in cardiopulmonary failure and death.

Unique Presentation of Bortezomib-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy Responsive to Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Eculizumab Therapy.

Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are a rare group of life-threatening hematological conditions characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Although our understanding of the pathophysiology and the availability of diagnostic testing has improved for primary TMAs, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, the pathophysiology underlying secondary TMAs, including drug-induced TMAs (DITMAs), remains less clear. In this case report, we present the unique case of a patient with a history of multiple myeloma that presented four months after the initiation of bortezomib therapy with a bortezomib-associated TMA that responded to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with plasma replacement and eculizumab therapy. This case demonstrates the possible utility of TPE with plasma replacement and eculizumab therapy in DITMA patients that fail to respond following a trial of holding the suspected medication.

Improvement in Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy Following Treatment with a Regimen Including Extracorporeal Photophoresis in a Heart Transplant Recipient

Introduction: Extracorporeal photophoresis (ECP) has been used for select heart transplant (HT) recipients with acute cellular rejection, recurrent or refractory rejection, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and as prophylactic therapy. Effects of ECP on coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are not as well-described. Case Report: A 48 year-old man with a history of familial cardiomyopathy required left ventricular assist device therapy and ultimately HT in 2001. He developed ISHLT CAV 1 (40% stenosis of LCx and RCA) with severe microvascular dysfunction detected on PET scan (MFR Total 1.14, LAD 1.11, LCx 0.98, RCA 1.40). He was started on treatment with everolimus, but progressive chronic kidney disease necessitated a change back to mycophenolate mofetil. Following this change, his chronic Class II DSA increased significantly and his renal function worsened requiring dialysis, during which time he also had COVID-19. He then presented in cardiogenic shock with ISHLT CAV 3 and pAMR 2 in July 2020 and was treated with an IABP, plasmapheresis, and thymoglobulin. He had recurrent pAMR 2 three months later, for which he was treated with plasmapheresis, bortezomib, rituximab, and ECP. Prior to initiation of ECP, his coronary angiogram demonstrated rapidly progressive ISHLT CAV 3 (80% proximal LAD, 80% ostial LCx, 70% OM1, and 80% mid RCA). Right heart catheterization demonstrated restrictive filling pressures and echocardiogram demonstrated normal graft systolic function. Four months following initiation of ECP therapy, repeat coronary angiography showed improvement of his CAV: the stenosis in the pLAD had regressed to 50%, the proximal LCX stenosis had regressed to 50%, and disease in the distal circumflex artery had also improved (Figure). In our patient, ECP along with multiple other therapies was associated with significant regression of CAV. Even many years post-HT, CAV may be amenable to some therapies.

Preliminary analysis of the MM21 trial: Response adaptive salvage treatment with daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DRD) for newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients failing front-line bortezomib-based induction therapy

BACKGROUND Bortezomib-based induction (V-IND) approaches are used in >90% of Australian newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma (NDTE MM) patients (pts) with a maximum of 4 cycles of V-IND therapy available via the pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS) prior to a planned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, NDTE MM patients failing V-IND (defined as best response < partial response [PR]) demonstrate shortened survival and continue to represent a sub-group of MM where a clear unmet medical need persists. The ALLG MM21 was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an early response adapted approach with a switch to an intensive Daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DRd)-based salvage-ASCT- consolidation strategy in patients failing V-IND. METHOD We present the results of a planned interim analysis of the multi-centre single arm study MM21 (ACTRN12618001490268). Eligible pts were NDTE MM who had received V-IND pre-ASCT and demonstrated either a sub-optimal response (SOR - defined as <minimal response [MR] after 2 cycles or <PR after 4 cycles of V-IND) or primary refractoriness (1REF - defined as disease progression while on or within 60 days of completing V-IND). Pre-ASCT DRd was DARA 16mg/kg IV days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for cycles 1 (C1) and 2, and on days 1 and 15 of C3 and C4;Lenalidomide 25mg OD D1-21;and, dexamethasone 40mg PO on D 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day cycle for C1 to C4. Anti-thrombotic and anti-viral prophylaxis was as per individual institutional practice. Between C3 and C4, patients underwent a G-CSF mobilised PBSC collection with a melphalan 200mg/m2 conditioned ACST after C4. Patients underwent D100 post-ASCT disease response assessment including EuroFlow minimal residual disease (MRD) testing. In the absence of disease progression, patients then received 12, 28-day cycles of consolidation comprising DARA IV 16mg/kg on D1, 15 of C1 and C2 and on D1 of C3 to C12, lenalidomide 25mg PO on D1-21 of C1 and C2 and 10mg OD on days 1-28 of C3 to C12;dexamethasone 40mg was weekly from C1 to C12. RESULTS Fifty patients were recruited from 7 Australian sites between March 2019 and July 2020. Median age was 61 years with 66% males. Disease status at study entry was SOR in 72% (<MR n = 9, <PR n = 27) and 1REF in 28%. Data cut-off date was June 30 2021. 45 patients (90%) received 4 complete cycles of salvage DRd. 11/50 (22%) patients did not undergo ASCT and 4 patients failed stem cell collection. Two pts were withdrawn due to treatment related gastrointestinal toxicity - persistent oesophagitis (n =1) and recurrent colitis (n=1). There were two deaths, due to COVID-19 pneumonia (n =1) and septic shock (n =1). Pre-ASCT response was evaluable in 43 patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 70% - complete response (CR) 6%, very good partial response (VGPR) 18%, partial response (PR) 46%, clinical benefit rate (CBR) 83% - MR 11% and stable disease (SD) 2% on Intention to Treat (ITT n = 50) analysis. 33 patients were assessed for MRD - MRD negative 6% on ITT (3/33 9%). Pre-consolidation disease assessment was evaluable in 37 pts, both ORR and CBR were 72% - stringent complete response (sCR) 4%, CR 14%, VGPR 24%, PR 30% ITT analysis. 31 pts were evaluated for MRD - MRD negative 28% ITT (14/31 45%). In 6 patients, MRD was omitted or could not be performed due to pre-analytical issues. Post-C2 consolidation assessment was evaluable in 37 pts, ORR 72% - sCR 2%, CR 24%, VGPR 26%, PR 20%, CBR 74% - SD 2% ITT analysis. To date, 22 patients have been evaluated for MRD with 4 patients awaiting results, MRD negative rate of 38% ITT (10/22 45%). MRD sample collection at this time-point was omitted in 7 patients, potentially skewing MRD negativity on ITT analysis. CONCLUSION Preliminary analysis of the MM21 trial demonstrates early response-adaptive escalation to DRd facilitated ASCT in the majority patients with robust ORR post-autologous stem cell transplant and substantial improvement in disease control, as reflected in improved rates of MRD and disease response to treatment. At both post-ASCT time-p ints there was significant drop off in MRD testing due to testing omission, potential skewing results of MRD analysis. MRD and duration of response analysis following C12 consolidation is planned and will be of interest. Current data suggests this drug combination shows potential for substantial benefit in the study population. (Figure Presented).

Bortezomib As Frontline Therapy in the Management of TTP

Introduction The current International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) guideline of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) recommends Therapeutic Plasma exchange (TPE) and corticosteroid in the management of TTP, with Rituximab and Caplasizumab as additional potential therapies [X Long Zheng et al, J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2496-2502]. This potentially fatal condition requires prompt diagnosis and treatment but large volume plasma treatment is not without risk and in settings with limited access with sufficient compatible plasma for apheretic exchange, this can delay this emergency therapy. We have been running the first therapeutic apheresis services with an Optia instrument in Uganda at the Joint Clinical Research Centre in Kampala city and TTP is the main indication for TPE. We present 2 recent sequential cases of TTP that were successfully managed when Bortezomib was combined with plasma therapy. Case1. A 25yr woman referred to our service on 29/09/2020, with recent onset of bruising, icterus, severe anemia Hgb5.7g/dL, Severe thrombocytopenia 8 x 10 3/uL, a high LDH 3909U with schistocytes on the peripheral blood film severe thrombocytopenia and a negative Direct Antiglobulin test. She was Blood Group B+. She was managed with 3 sessions of TPE of 2.1, 1.1 and 2.0 plasma volume exchanges with 6727mL, 3026mL and 5459mL of replacement plasma respectively and oral prednisone 60mg daily without remission. Subsequent quantities of plasma were insufficient for apheresis and were instead transfused. She also received weekly Rituximab 500mg (IV) but without significant recovery in the platelet count until she received Bortezomib 2mg (SC) when there was corresponding recovery of the platelet count and with each dose to a total of 4 doses (Figure 1). Case2. A 55yr man was previously well and shopping in a mall when he had an index episode of seizures on 19.Jun.2021 and was hospitalized that day with altered consciousness and focal motor signs. He required intubation for 3 days and at the time of hospitalization, he had Hgb 9gm/dL, PLT 17 x 10 3/uL, LDH2177U, with numerous schistocytes on the peripheral blood film and a negative Direct Antiglobulin Test. The baseline blood sample functional ADAMTS13 was 3% and had Blood Group AB+. He had received the 1 st dose of the Astra-Zeneca Covid19 vaccine on 06.May.2021. It was not possible to get any AB plasma and we considered it risky to perform large volume TPE with non-AB plasma and he was instead treated with daily transfusion with Group A+ Plasma concurrent with daily Prednisone 60mg. Because of our previous experience of poor response to Rituximab, we opted to treat him upfront with 4 doses of 2mg bortezomib (SC) given 3 days apart. He made brisk recovery to complete remission and was discharged for weekly outpatient CBC and LDH monitoring. His platelet count subsequently dropped without a corresponding drop in the Hgb and no rise in the Hgb. We initially re-hospitalized him for 4 more days of plasma transfusion but without a brisk response and since the LDH was not increasing, the isolated Thrombocytopenia was considered a side effect of Bortezomib that was expected to resolve and he receive no further treatment but continued to recover to complete remission as an out-patient (figure 2). Discussion: Our findings suggest a possible role for Bortezomib in frontline therapy for TTP with potential to reduce the plasma requirement in TPE and this approach warrants a randomized clinical trial. [Formula presented] Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Bortezomib Indicated in the management of Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

The development of a home-based therapeutic platform for multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Myeloma (MM) accounts for 1-2% of all malignancies but is the second most common hematological malignancy. It is characterized by a proliferation of malignant plasma cells. The treatment paradigm of MM in Australia is traditionally hospital-based, complex, and costly. While MM comprises 1-2% of cancer diagnoses, it appears in the top 10 cancer diagnoses requiring hospital admission. The cumulative time spent receiving treatment is a significant burden for patients. The ability to receive treatment at home and maximize time away from hospital-based settings is a key preference for patients receiving anticancer therapies over a prolonged period of time. METHODS: The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital's combined Clinical Hematology Unit has collaborated with their Hospital in the Home departments to develop several innovative programs to address this. RESULTS: We describe our current active programs and potential developments in home-based MM therapy. CONCLUSION: We have enabled large numbers of patients to receive complex therapies in their own home and the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the pace of the roll out without any compromise in safety. We anticipate that the next raft of immunotherapies will be able to transition into the @Home treatment setting in the coming years.

Cybord-Dara in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: Follow up Results from the 16-Bcni-001/Ctrial-IE 16-02 Study Show High Rates of MRD Negativity at End of Treatment

The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Daratumumab has shown impressive activity in combination with other agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), improving progression free survival and overall survival in several phase 3 studies. We conducted a phase 1b study of intravenous Daratumumab (16 mg/kg) with weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3-1.5 mg/m 2 ), cyclophosphamide (150-300 mg/m 2), and dexamethasone (40 mg) (CyBorD-DARA) as induction before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), followed by CyBorD-DARA consolidation (2 cycles) and monthly DARA +/- bortezomib (in high-risk disease) maintenance for 24 months. We hypothesized that the addition of cyclophosphamide could lead to enhanced antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02955810. We previously reported the initial results of this study. 1. In addition to a favourable safety profile we observed promising anti-MM activity with 10 of 13 patients (77%) in whom assessment was possible achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity at a sensitivity of 10 -5 by next generation sequencing (NGS) after ASCT. We now report the results at EOT, with a focus on MRD. Eligible patients were ≤70 years of age with untreated transplant-eligible MM. 18 patients were enrolled. Median age was 56.5 years (range, 32-66 years), 61% were male and 94% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. The International Staging System stages were I, II, and III in 78%, 17%, and 6% of patients, respectively. 29% of patients had high-risk genetic features by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) or gene expression profiling, including 17p deletion in 12% and t(4;14) and t(14;16) in 6% each. On an ITT basis, the rates of very good partial remission or better (≥VGPR) after ASCT, consolidation and at end of treatment (EOT) (after completion of 24 months of DARA) were 94%, 94% and 81% respectively, and rates of complete response or better (≥CR) were 50%, 63% and 63% respectively. Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment was possible in 13 patients after induction, ASCT and consolidation, and 10 at EOT. Sustained MRD negativity (ie. MRD negativity after ASCT, consolidation and at EOT) to a level of 10 -5 by NGS was achieved in 33% (ITT). Of 13 patients who remained on study at EOT in VGPR or better, 54% were MRD negative (MRD was unavailable in 23%). 7 patients were MRD negative after both ASCT and consolidation. Of these patients, all evaluable at EOT(6/7) remained MRD negative, with 1 patient unable to undergo MRD assessment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but remaining in CR. Nausea and diarrhoea occurred in 89% of patients, but were mostly grade 1-2 (Grade ≥3 nausea 17%;diarrhoea 6%). Neutropenia occurred in 44% (Grade ≥3 17%), anaemia in 39% (Grade ≥3 22%), and thrombocytopenia in 33% (Grade ≥3 22%). The rate of neutropenic sepsis was 11%. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 50% (Grade ≥3 6%) and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 33% (Grade ≥3 0%) The most commonly reported serious adverse event (SAE) was sepsis in 22%. One patient developed abnormal liver function tests leading to discontinuation from the trial. CyBorD-DARA induction, consolidation and DARA-maintenance is an effective and well-tolerated IMiD free regimen in transplant-eligible patients with MM. MRD negativity at a level of > 10 -5 after ASCT and consolidation may be predictive of sustained MRD negativity at EOT. References: 1. Naicker SD, et al. Cyclophosphamide alters the tumor cell secretome to potentiate the anti-myeloma activity of daratumumab through augmentation of macrophage-mediated antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis. Oncoimmunology. 2021 Jan 25;10(1):1859263. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1859263. PMID: 33552684;PMCID: PMC7849715. 2. O'Dwyer M, et al. CyBorD-DARA is potent initial induction for MM and enhances ADCP: initial results of the 16-BCNI-001/CTRIAL-IE 16-02 study. Blood Adv. 2019 Jun 25;3(12):1815-1825. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000010. PMID: 31201169;PMCI : PMC6595251. Disclosures: O'Dwyer: ONK Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Quinn: Takeda: Honoraria. Szegezdi: ONK Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Antibody and T-Cell Responses to Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with B-Cell Lymphomas and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Introduction: While the approval of three commercial vaccines for the SARS-CoV-2 virus has provided upwards of 95% protection against the coronavirus for healthy subjects, the efficacy among patients with hematologic malignancies remains unknown. Immune dysfunction and impaired humoral responses to other vaccines are well documented in patients with CLL and B-cell lymphomas. Furthermore, they suffer increased risk of morbidity and mortality with Covid-19 infections compared to healthy controls. As such, the immune response elicited by the available Covid-19 vaccines in these patients is of utmost importance to investigate. Methods: We performed a prospective exploratory analysis in CLL and B-cell lymphoma patients to evaluate humoral and T-cell responses to the commercially available mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. The objective was to obtain samples at baseline and 2-3 weeks post-vaccination, although some samples were obtained outside of this timeframe. IgG to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) was quantified using the ImmunoCAP platform (Thermo Fisher);results were compared to data from 167 subjects in a healthy vaccine cohort at the University of Virginia. T-cell responses to spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were measured in 3 NHL patients and 3 matched healthy controls at 2-3 weeks post-2nd vaccine dose, by T cell receptor dependent activation-induced marker (AIM) assay using pooled peptides spanning spike protein. Results: Among 18 patients currently evaluable, median age is 67 y and 72% are male. Diagnoses include CLL (5), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL;4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (3), follicular lymphoma (1), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL;4), and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (1). All patients except 1 MZL patient are currently receiving or have received systemic treatment for their hematologic malignancy. Treatments include immunochemotherapy in 5 patients, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in 5, single agent anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in 4, and other targeted therapy in 4 patients including venetoclax, lenalidomide, and bortezomib. Two patients had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation, 1 patient allogeneic transplantation, and 1 patient chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Among patients on therapy (n=10), median time from start of current treatment to Covid-19 vaccine was 136 days (range 13 - 829d). In patients who had completed therapy (n=8), median time from end of last treatment to vaccine was 153 days (range 37 - 355d). Seven patients had a blood sample drawn between 1 week and 1 month post-second mRNA vaccine dose. IgG antibody levels to spike RBD were markedly lower in NHL/CLL patients compared to those observed in the control cohort (median 2.1 µg/mL [IQR 0.23-7.6 µg/mL] versus 60.3 µg/mL [IQR 42.5-87.0 µg/mL], Mann-Whitney P<0.001, Figure 1). Of the 16 samples that were obtained post-vaccine dose 2, nine had IgG levels less than 2 µg/mL (manufacturer lower threshold of detection), whereas only 5 of 252 samples from the control cohort were less than this level (Chi-square P<0.001, RR =39.6 (95%CI 15.1-100)). Antibody responses were independent of type of therapy (Figure 2). The percentage of total lymphocytes and T cells was generally reduced in NHL patients versus controls;however, CD4+ T cells responding to spike protein were readily detected, despite the absence of antibody responses in 2 of these patients, both of whom had MCL. Curiously, 2 patients (1 MZL with and 1 MCL patient without antibodies) displayed a higher percentage of activated CD4+ T cells compared to controls, and CD8+ T cells also responded in each of these patients. T-cell responses were specific for spike protein as evidenced by no response to peptides of whole nucleoprotein. Conclusions: Compared to a reference cohort, patients with B-cell malignancies, both treatment-naïve and on treatment, have impaired antibody response to the commercially available mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. Despite this, virus-responsive T-cells can be readil detected, even in the absence of antibodies. Further research is needed to determine whether antibody levels can be used as a biomarker for vaccine efficacy, whether the presence of virus-specific T-cells confers protection in the absence of antibodies, and to determine the effect of booster doses of vaccine on immune response. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Wilson: Thermo-Fisher Phadia: Research Funding. Woodfolk: Regeneron: Other: Salary Support, Research Funding;NIH/NIAID: Other: Salary support, Research Funding;University of Virginia: Other: Salary Support;Regeneron: Other: research sponsor and salary support;FDA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Clinical and Experimental Allergy: Other: Editorial Board. Portell: Abbvie: Research Funding;Aptitude Health: Honoraria;Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding;Xencor: Research Funding;Pharmacyclics: Honoraria;BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding;Targeted Oncology: Honoraria;Morphosys: Honoraria;SeaGen: Research Funding;TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding;Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding;Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding;Genentech: Research Funding;VelosBio: Research Funding. Williams: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.